<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875</id><updated>2011-06-07T23:25:33.250-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Yelnick</title><subtitle type='html'>Commentary on politics, technology and stock markets guided by Elliott Wave principles. Is Bob Prechter Hari Seldon, and has he invented Psycho-History? Or is Elliot Wave no more than Ptolemaic epicycles? On Cheer's, Cliff Claven said he had an infallible system for predicting the next President, and it could predict all prior elections. His prediction: "Yelnick McWahwah." And yet, Elliott often provides remarkable predictions. Stay tuned.</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default?start-index=101&amp;max-results=100'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>144</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106842830850762721</id><published>2003-11-09T17:37:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2003-11-09T17:38:32.766-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Yelnick has moved!</title><summary type='text'>See our new site at http://yelnick.typepad.com.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106842830850762721'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106842830850762721'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_11_01_archive.html#106842830850762721' title='Yelnick has moved!'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106790727208180905</id><published>2003-11-03T16:54:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2003-11-03T16:54:34.420-08:00</updated><title type='text'>What 7% Growth Means for the Market</title><summary type='text'>  The STU dropped a   mind-bending analysis today.  Guess the last three times we have had 7% GDP   growth?        At the peak in     2000 before the drop,    At the peak in     1987 before the crash, and     Now  Intuitively we think we should be bullish when we see   strong growth, but the causality is the other way around: the stock market   doesn't rise after strong GDP growth, the stock </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106790727208180905'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106790727208180905'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_11_01_archive.html#106790727208180905' title='What 7% Growth Means for the Market'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106764763454365146</id><published>2003-10-31T16:47:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2003-10-31T16:47:16.370-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Beware the Nones of November</title><summary type='text'>  As we track the   Decline and Fall of the Greenspan Empire (aka The Greatest Asset Mania of All   Time), the timing of the elusive Wave 2 top is the next big thing.  We all   know the Ides of March is mid-month.  Less known is another day in the   Roman calendar, the Nones, which in November is Nov5.  The STU today   sharpened their forecast for the top to the Nones of November: a top around </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106764763454365146'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106764763454365146'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106764763454365146' title='Beware the Nones of November'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106741193097341605</id><published>2003-10-28T23:18:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2003-10-28T23:18:52.306-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Prechter's New Count, Same Message</title><summary type='text'>  Yelnick has noted   that Prechter has hinted at changing his count in recent newsletters.    Today he unveiled his new count.  The count may be different, but the   message is the same, and the prediction is much closer to Yelnick's view: a top   of around Dow10K at around Nov 11.     Prechter had   counted the Dow since Jan00 as a nested series of waves 1 - 2, so that we were   nearing the 3 </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106741193097341605'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106741193097341605'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106741193097341605' title='Prechter&apos;s New Count, Same Message'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106704894336938716</id><published>2003-10-24T19:29:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-24T19:29:03.453-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Financial Reckoning Day</title><summary type='text'>    The markets have   gone south since Zoran's call of a top on Oct 15.  Is this it, or will   there be the final pop up to the Yelnick 78% retracement of just under   Dow10k?  So far the drop has been impulsive, which supports the case for an   Oct15 top.  The market will now retrace in a little wave 2.  If it   goes above Dow9773, it is likely it will continue to a higher top and test   Dow10k</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106704894336938716'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106704894336938716'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106704894336938716' title='Financial Reckoning Day'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106660919933879630</id><published>2003-10-19T17:19:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-19T22:00:38.223-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Zoran Calls the Top</title><summary type='text'>Zoran has issued an update which is very worth reading.  The DOW-An EWP view-19 October-2003.pdf  Calls for a top last week on Oct15.  This coming week will tell how prescient this is.  Zoran uses a different count than Prechter's (which is orthodox Elliott).  Yelnick has promoted this count for several years also:&gt; Prechter has wave IV bottom in 1932, Zoran and Yelnick say 1949&gt; Prechter has</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106660919933879630'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106660919933879630'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106660919933879630' title='Zoran Calls the Top'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106627289523022131</id><published>2003-10-15T19:54:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-16T19:02:35.716-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Prechter Triangulates </title><summary type='text'>  Prechter's EWT   today used the C word (crash).  He sees the market nearing the end of a   rare expanding wedge or diagonal triangle, which is always an ending   formation.  As a consequence, he sees the odds of a rapid decline or   massacre in November as the market catches up (or should we say down) to   reality.  Crashes are rare events, so view this prediction as unlikely; but   the extreme</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106627289523022131'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106627289523022131'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106627289523022131' title='Prechter Triangulates '/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106615740024020702</id><published>2003-10-14T11:50:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-14T11:49:59.683-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Silicon Valley Tea Leaves: VC Funding Hits Pre-Bubble Level</title><summary type='text'>    Corante reports this story from Investor’s Business   Daily:      Mark Jensen, national director of VC services at   Deloitte &amp; Touche, weighs in on the current state of the U.S. venture   capital industry. While the industry is "still recovering from whiplash," VC   funding has apparently returned back to its pre-boom levels: in 1996, the VC   industry invested $10 billion; in 2003, the VC </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106615740024020702'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106615740024020702'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106615740024020702' title='Silicon Valley Tea Leaves: VC Funding Hits Pre-Bubble Level'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106577061566550563</id><published>2003-10-10T00:23:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-30T11:40:33.646-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Fighting Terrorism by Empowering Woman</title><summary type='text'>  Aristophanes in Lysistrata   wrote a wonderful satire with a gem of truth: to prevent war, the women   withhold sex.  George Gilder, before he wrote the Bible of the Reagan   Revolution, Wealth and Poverty, wrote a screed against feminism called   Social   Suicide, which, although much vilified and satirized, also   contains a germ of truth:  through marriage, young and restless men   are made </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106577061566550563'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106577061566550563'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106577061566550563' title='Fighting Terrorism by Empowering Woman'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106572197875246371</id><published>2003-10-09T10:52:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-09T10:52:58.156-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Can Govt Stats be Trusted?</title><summary type='text'>  This disturbing report from Merrill Lynch,   sent in by a loyal Yelnick reader:  that recent GDP figures assume a much   larger increase in tech spending than other sources support.  This on top   of the head-fake employment numbers a week ago, where the Labor Dept reported an   increase, but the fine print showed they had removed a much larger number from   previous reports, so they were able </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106572197875246371'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106572197875246371'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106572197875246371' title='Can Govt Stats be Trusted?'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106557038895699002</id><published>2003-10-07T16:46:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-07T16:46:28.496-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Silicon Valley Tea Leaves: Seller's Market?</title><summary type='text'>  Fortune reported   more tech optimism today.  In addition, in a remarkably quick   turnaround, the VCs now seem starved for deal flow.  ("What ye shall sow,   so ye shall reap").  In the last few weeks a stack of 'social networking'   companies - Friendster, LinkedIn, Tribe - got funded at higher than recent A   round valuations.  More significantly, they were chased by VCs wishing to   get in </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106557038895699002'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106557038895699002'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106557038895699002' title='Silicon Valley Tea Leaves: Seller&apos;s Market?'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106557007775168374</id><published>2003-10-07T16:41:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-07T16:41:17.533-07:00</updated><title type='text'>to B or not 2 be</title><summary type='text'>  Wave action   suggests higher highs ahead.  We appear back to the march towards the 78%   tretracement level of Dow9930, and therefore back towards a turn date of around   11/11.  Also, Prechter has hinted in his last two Theorists that he might   rejigger the count from wave 2 of (3) of [3] down, to wave B after a wave A down   into last October.  Wave B's behave like wave 2's except can go </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106557007775168374'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106557007775168374'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106557007775168374' title='to B or not 2 be'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106538589043078776</id><published>2003-10-05T13:31:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-05T13:32:02.186-07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><summary type='text'>Scandal Candidate: Cheney and UA93Yelnick said:  "Prechter has gone out on his limb, and predicted that Bush too will be brought down by some scandal, yet to emerge, for actions already taken."  My scandal candidate: The fact (reported by Dan Balz and Bob Woodward in the WaPo) that Cheney ordered and then confirmed the order to shoot down UA93 on 9/11, and the suspicion-bordering-on-fact that </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106538589043078776'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106538589043078776'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106538589043078776' title=''/><author><name>Ethan</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='22' height='32' src='http://farm1.static.flickr.com/29/61105188_5f14ee855a_o.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106538547023907985</id><published>2003-10-05T13:24:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-05T13:56:42.590-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Kennedy Republican Tax Cut</title><summary type='text'>  Art Laffer, the   scion of supply side, proffered a perfect tax proposal for Gov. Schwarzenegger   to fix California's fiscal problem: a radical simplification down to two   taxes: 6% on business net sales, and 6% on personal income less the normal  middle class deductions (mortgage, charity, and -   significantly - rent).  This would match current California tax revenues   and would replace </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106538547023907985'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106538547023907985'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106538547023907985' title='The Kennedy Republican Tax Cut'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106538522067330511</id><published>2003-10-05T13:20:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-06T12:49:33.583-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Kennedy Republican and the Internet Democracy</title><summary type='text'>  A NYT editorial   today picked up on Yelnick's theme that the California Recall is presaging   the next shift in US politics - towards more direct political action, an   Internet Democracy.  What is behind this is a revolt against   politicians.  This is why the perfect Presidential candidate for the times   is not Howard Dean, nor Hillary, but Wesley Clarke - not just an outsider, but a   </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106538522067330511'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106538522067330511'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106538522067330511' title='Kennedy Republican and the Internet Democracy'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106537996815596515</id><published>2003-10-05T11:52:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-05T11:52:47.576-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Rush, to Judgement</title><summary type='text'>  Bear markets bring   down the stock market icons of the prior Bull.  Martha Stewart, Frank   Quattrone.  The grizzler bears begin to mawl the icons of the prior era   outside of the financial arena.  This one seem to be about to knock   Rush Limbaugh off his perch.  Prechter has gone out on his limb, and   predicted that Bush too will be brought down by some scandal, yet to emerge, for   </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106537996815596515'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106537996815596515'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106537996815596515' title='Rush, to Judgement'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106537487962562029</id><published>2003-10-05T10:27:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-05T10:27:59.373-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Cautionary Note</title><summary type='text'>  The markets went   through the 62% retracement level, and shot above the 78% level, but didn't   break the Sep19 highs before reversing at the close on Friday.  Technically   a wave 2 has to break the start of wave 1 to change the count, but *usually*   when it passes 78% it keeps going.  Zoran's weekend update points out that   the market shot up on Friday on good employment news, then turned </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106537487962562029'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106537487962562029'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106537487962562029' title='Cautionary Note'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106504563271644292</id><published>2003-10-01T15:00:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-10-01T15:09:38.356-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Chinese Curse Day</title><summary type='text'>  What happened in   the last two days is that the little wave [i] down extended in its subwave 5 to   a lower low, and today we have begun what should be an ABC pattern back up in   little wave [ii].  The Nasdaq is lagging, so watch it to spurt up.    The 61.8% retracement is SP1020 or Dow9500, and the 78% retracement is SP1030,   Dow9570.  If it goes above the Sep19 highs, something else is </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106504563271644292'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106504563271644292'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_archive.html#106504563271644292' title='Chinese Curse Day'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106487187600939214</id><published>2003-09-29T14:44:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-29T14:44:35.743-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Confirmation of Wave Count</title><summary type='text'>  Today went as   expected.  The initial down move completed a five-wave pattern since the   Sep19 high, marking the end of wave [i].  The intraday reversal began a   corrective wave [ii].  More serious downside to begin once this little wave   [ii] sputters to an end, possibly as early as Wed, probably by the end of the   week. </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106487187600939214'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106487187600939214'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106487187600939214' title='Confirmation of Wave Count'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106479358929146658</id><published>2003-09-28T16:59:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-28T16:59:48.666-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Weekly Charts</title><summary type='text'>  ChartSpeak   is running a free trial this week.  To login to the site itself, use   username:  stock  password:  market     To summarize: The   movement since last October has been the longest sustained rally in the S&amp;P   since 1998, but appears to be ending.  Key indicator is that the small caps   are pulling the market down, whereas they usually they pull the market up at the   beginning of a</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106479358929146658'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106479358929146658'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106479358929146658' title='Weekly Charts'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106479133503275397</id><published>2003-09-28T16:22:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-28T16:22:14.916-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Calif Recall Presages - Direct Democracy</title><summary type='text'>  The SF Chronicle   ran several excellent articles today on the   recall and what it means.  Polls show that the race is coming down   to Davis vs. Ahhnold, with the margin in favor of   recall beginning to widen. (The Gallup   poll showed it began at 70%, faded to 53%, and now seems to be at 63% and   widening; overnight   party polls showed it peaking at 58%, fading to close to even, and now</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106479133503275397'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106479133503275397'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106479133503275397' title='Calif Recall Presages - Direct Democracy'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106479130616358345</id><published>2003-09-28T16:21:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-28T16:21:46.056-07:00</updated><title type='text'>It's the data, stupid!</title><summary type='text'>  Fascinating   insight from Tim O'Reilly in InfoWorld.    He says open source licensing isn't working as planned, as the GNU license   contemplates sharing of proprietary extensions for software that is   redistributed.  Instead what is happening is use of open source in web   services such as Amazon, Google, etc.  No need to share as no   redistribution.  Hence able to build proprietary </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106479130616358345'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106479130616358345'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106479130616358345' title='It&apos;s the data, stupid!'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106463746570583044</id><published>2003-09-26T21:37:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-26T21:37:45.336-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Sector convergence</title><summary type='text'>  Wave pattern is   quite clearly a five-wave impulse down, which signals change of trend.    Next week should see continued down and a reversal which might last for several   days.  Wave pattern also indicates that this trend change will last for a   while.  Most likely pattern is down into the Xmas selling   season.      What is beginning   to emerge is a convergence of sectors across the stock</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106463746570583044'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106463746570583044'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106463746570583044' title='Sector convergence'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106448004151230906</id><published>2003-09-25T01:54:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-25T01:54:01.770-07:00</updated><title type='text'>impulsive decline </title><summary type='text'>  The sudden   downdraft looks impulsive and broke the lower trendline since March.  This   is very significant.  Possible the end of wave 2 *finally* happened.    More on this over the weekend.     The dollar is   sinking and gold is rising.  The gold bugs are out in force.  Likely   to be disappointed - the STU count marks gold as about to peak.         Bush is plummeting   and Hillary is </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106448004151230906'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106448004151230906'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106448004151230906' title='impulsive decline '/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106444260282892341</id><published>2003-09-24T15:30:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-24T15:30:02.583-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Margin Mania</title><summary type='text'>Alan Newman of Crosscurrents is an astute contriarian market analyst whose chart of the month is often an eye-opener.  His most recent newsletter has a stunner in it: margin debt of investors at NASD firms (who make up the Nasdaq market makers) has shot beyond manic levels reached at the peak!  A statistical glitch?  Unlikely - the NASD has issued a warning about this.  More likely "an abyss of </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106444260282892341'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106444260282892341'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106444260282892341' title='Margin Mania'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106427167303063555</id><published>2003-09-22T16:01:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-22T16:01:13.210-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Pullback or Trend Change?</title><summary type='text'>  Watching when the   herd lift their collective heads up and sniff for lions in the grass (bears in   the woods!) can be pretty funny.  Dollar has been dropping over 20% for two   years, and a statement at the G7 meeting that the US wants more 'flexible'   exchange rates wakes everyone up.  Oh!  Should we panic and run?        How significant   was the stock and bond drop today?  The indexes </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106427167303063555'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106427167303063555'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106427167303063555' title='Pullback or Trend Change?'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106423578117851758</id><published>2003-09-22T06:03:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-22T06:03:01.303-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Fibonacci Ratios and Market Makers</title><summary type='text'>Yelnick has been contemplating how fib ratos might develop in market indexes.  Quick remarkable how often market movements shift at fibonacci ratios of each other.  Prechter attibutes it to the fear &amp; greed action of the limbic system in investors - since natural systems tend to show fib ratios in physical elements, he postulates it is also wired into behavior from the baser brain functions.  It </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106423578117851758'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106423578117851758'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106423578117851758' title='Fibonacci Ratios and Market Makers'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106423453944020999</id><published>2003-09-22T05:42:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-22T05:42:19.006-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Zoran Teaches</title><summary type='text'>Zoran Gayer is developing a modern version of Elliott wave theory, blending the orthodox Prechter view with the rival Neely view, and adding a better understand of chaos theory.   He is attempting to solve the most bedeviling problem with ewaves, how to determine when a correction is ending.  We have seen over the past year how Prechter's STU continually calls a premature end to this wave 2.  For</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106423453944020999'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106423453944020999'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106423453944020999' title='Zoran Teaches'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-10641431240900392</id><published>2003-09-21T04:18:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-21T04:18:44.053-07:00</updated><title type='text'>1987 Redux</title><summary type='text'>  The STU has backed   off its call of Sep8 as the end of wave 2.  They still suggest a near term   top, in the range of SP1045, or if that is breached SP1060 +/- 8 (on the Dow the   equivalents are Dow9707 or Dow9745 +/- 12).  Give them time, they will come   to the Yelnick view of a 78% retrace, and a test of Dow10K.         Their timing seems   optimistic as well.  Walter Bressert has tracked </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/10641431240900392'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/10641431240900392'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#10641431240900392' title='1987 Redux'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106369856510389025</id><published>2003-09-16T00:49:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-16T00:57:22.383-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Recall Wave 2!</title><summary type='text'>  The wave action   today of a momentary move up and slip slidin' away in both Dow and S&amp;P (and   after a longer pop up, in the Nasdaq) increases the odds that Sep8 was the end   of Wave 2 since last Oct.  We are now entering wave iii territory and   should see a more impulsive down move.  Note that in '29 and '87 the   crashes happened the first trading day following a fibonacci 55 calendar days</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106369856510389025'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106369856510389025'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106369856510389025' title='Recall Wave 2!'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106348009497634817</id><published>2003-09-13T12:08:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-13T12:08:15.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Oracle Speaks</title><summary type='text'>  The WSJ ran two   upbeat stories Friday, one on economists predicting the strongest growth in Q4   since 1999, and the other on anticipation that Oracle's after-hours earnings   announcement would show solidifying business software sales.  The two are   connected, as the economist are expecting business spending to begin to pick up,   sustaining the economy as consumer spending begins to abate.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106348009497634817'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106348009497634817'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106348009497634817' title='The Oracle Speaks'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106343200054041675</id><published>2003-09-12T22:46:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-12T22:48:40.220-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Phoney Recovery?</title><summary type='text'>Prechter exhorted the faithful this week to resist the temptation of wave 2 bullish optimism, as wave 2's are wont to cause.  He compared the statistics of prior recoveries to today's.  The recoveries of the period from 1949-1989 were quite strong; the recovery after the Bush I recession of 1991 was middling, and the current recovery is downright weak, no more than "a temporary respite within a </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106343200054041675'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106343200054041675'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106343200054041675' title='Phoney Recovery?'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106342983063242465</id><published>2003-09-12T22:10:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-12T22:10:30.666-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Are We There yet?</title><summary type='text'>STU called a possible top for wave 2 at Monday's highs.  The wave action Tues and Wed was a clear five-wave impulse down, and the action Thu and Fri (today) has been sloppy and corrective.  Accordingly, supports the case for a change in trend.  But is this THE top?  Not yet clear.  Monday should be down at the open, or if not, down sharply Tues and Wed.  </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106342983063242465'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106342983063242465'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106342983063242465' title='Are We There yet?'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106316284463342978</id><published>2003-09-09T20:00:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-09T20:00:44.666-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Recall Bush?</title><summary type='text'>Well, it hasn't come to that.  But his poll numbers are plummeting and his popularity is evaporating as fast as his Dad's.   Today's WSJ had a commentary called "Bush's Talk About Spending Discipline Is So Much Hot Air" next to a news report that the deficit would crest $500B shortly.  The out-of-control spending involved Medicare, AIDS in Africa, homeland security and of course nation building </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106316284463342978'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106316284463342978'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106316284463342978' title='Recall Bush?'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106315968305894027</id><published>2003-09-09T19:08:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-09T20:14:29.086-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Senate Threatens China with Tariffs, Shoots off Big Toe in Process</title><summary type='text'>Today a senator introduced punitive tariffs to force the Chinese to revalue the Yuan.  Is this good policy?It certainly is risky - it is the type of attitude that happened in the 1930s with the Smoot-Hawley tariff that led to a beggar-thy-neighbor death spiral of world trade.  Not a surprise for the Yelnick worldview, as the social mood now most resembles the early '30s, and we shouldn't be </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106315968305894027'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106315968305894027'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106315968305894027' title='Senate Threatens China with Tariffs, Shoots off Big Toe in Process'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106313363529140004</id><published>2003-09-09T11:53:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-09T11:53:55.290-07:00</updated><title type='text'>False breakout</title><summary type='text'>  Larry Katz has   updated his e-wave forecast here.    Larry is a very good tech analyst and looks at a variety of indicators to   cross-correlate where we are in the wave pattern.  As the summer trading   range developed, he projected one of two outcomes: (1) another up move of the   magnitude of Mar-Jun (bullish), or (2) a false breakout and then serious drop,   much like the summer of '98 (</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106313363529140004'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106313363529140004'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106313363529140004' title='False breakout'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106306797297946497</id><published>2003-09-08T17:39:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-08T23:45:57.993-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Optimism at the Peak</title><summary type='text'>A loyal Yelnick reader and sometime (but always constructive) critic commented on howoptimistic the Silicon Valley Tea Leaves had become - was Yelnick becoming abull?  Yelnick calls them as he sees them, so if optimism is afoot, it willbe reported.  But before you delight in such a turnaround, I must add thatoptimism is what a bear would expect in a wave 2.  One can get a good readon where </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106306797297946497'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106306797297946497'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106306797297946497' title='Optimism at the Peak'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106296735714819559</id><published>2003-09-07T13:42:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-07T13:42:37.160-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Redneck Greenspan</title><summary type='text'>  Zoran forwarded to   Yelnick a translation of the Jackson   Hole speech by Greenspan.  For those of you who have listened to   Greenspan speak, or God forbid read one of his speeches, you realize he speaks   with multisyllabic obscurity for a reason - if the mysterious ways of the   financial priesthood were to become widely known, it would move markets against   their wishes.       </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106296735714819559'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106296735714819559'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106296735714819559' title='Redneck Greenspan'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106295616367906448</id><published>2003-09-07T10:36:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-07T10:36:03.590-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Is Oz Showing the Yellow Brick Road?</title><summary type='text'>  Zoran reports that   the Australian index, the SPI, appears to have topped last week.    Occasionally the SPI presages to S&amp;P.  More support for the STU view   that the top may come early this week.  if so, it creates one of the great   shorting opportunities of our lifetime.  Yelnick has commented that one way   to play the ewave analysis is wait for the end of wave 2 before taking a   </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106295616367906448'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106295616367906448'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106295616367906448' title='Is Oz Showing the Yellow Brick Road?'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106280878395840465</id><published>2003-09-05T17:39:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-05T17:39:43.866-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Bullish Sentiment Hits '87 Extremes</title><summary type='text'>The STU also reports that bullishness among investment advisors continues to rise and is hitting levels not seen until just before the '87 crash.  Also, insiders are selling $44 for every $1 they buy, a level last seen right before the 28% drop in the S&amp;P into the Sep01 low.  This is what to expect at the end of a wave 2.   </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106280878395840465'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106280878395840465'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106280878395840465' title='Bullish Sentiment Hits &apos;87 Extremes'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106280763713935122</id><published>2003-09-05T17:20:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-05T17:22:16.290-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Wave 2 End *May* Be Nigh</title><summary type='text'>One down day, and the STU sees the end of wave 2 is just a few days away.   Recall that we are in wave C of 2 since the Mar03 low.  Wave C is breaking out into a five wave pattern, which is expected.  The first 4 waves have already occurred, with the summer trading range since Jun17 representing a wave iv triangle.  We are now in the final wave v.   This wave v has subdivided into its own </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106280763713935122'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106280763713935122'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106280763713935122' title='Wave 2 End *May* Be Nigh'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106270114089614968</id><published>2003-09-04T11:45:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-04T13:00:44.053-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Microsoft Blazes a Patent Trail (Of Tears)</title><summary type='text'>  Patents are rapidly rising in pre-eminence as we enter a period where large companies are much more nimble in buying or building new innovations than previously, avoiding the mistakes of   IBM and DEC in the PC era of the early '80s.   Given that the   innovator can be copied faster than they can establish a market position, IP   becomes the critical competitive barrier.  InterTrust's success </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106270114089614968'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106270114089614968'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106270114089614968' title='Microsoft Blazes a Patent Trail (Of Tears)'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106265545953748134</id><published>2003-09-03T23:04:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-04T11:37:19.536-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Silicon Valley Tea Leaves: Q2 VC Survey - Clear Improvement</title><summary type='text'>Fenwick &amp; West publishes a quarterly VC survey whose conclusion for Q2 provides support for a rebound in VC, including (most telling) an increase in valuations.   Deals in the hotter spaces (social software for example) report VCs cold-calling to get in.  We could see a remarkable switch in a short time from a buyers market to a sellers market.  The Fenwick report's conclusion reads:Conclusion </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106265545953748134'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106265545953748134'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106265545953748134' title='Silicon Valley Tea Leaves: Q2 VC Survey - Clear Improvement'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106262191788364096</id><published>2003-09-03T13:45:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-03T14:29:49.340-07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Fragile Wave 2</title><summary type='text'>The STU has now more fully joined the Yelnick view that we remain in a Wave 2 which will retrace 78% of the Wave 1 down since mar02, just as the two prior wave 2's in the Dow both retraced that far.  Normally wave 2s retrace 61.8%, but these aren't normal times, and the extreme retracement recapitulates the extreme heights of the mania.  A number of pundits expect a poor Sep/Oct but they may be</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106262191788364096'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106262191788364096'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106262191788364096' title='The Fragile Wave 2'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106261561673353400</id><published>2003-09-03T12:00:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-09-03T12:24:22.780-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Silicon Valley Tea Leaves; Get Ready for the Rebound!</title><summary type='text'>A flurry of articles and activities show the growing optimism in the Valley.  The WSJ had two articles, summmarized in Corante (the online WSJ requires paid subscription) as follows:Bets are on again - Wall Street Journal (sub req) The Wall Street Journal reports that the VC firms of Sand Hill Road are starting to poke around hot technology sectors for new deals. Investments in early-stage </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106261561673353400'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106261561673353400'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_archive.html#106261561673353400' title='Silicon Valley Tea Leaves; Get Ready for the Rebound!'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106201166632846136</id><published>2003-08-27T12:14:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-27T12:14:26.330-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Can the Fed Stop Deflation?</title><summary type='text'>Prechter's EWI site   has posted their primarydeflation analysis.  Worth studying.   Prechter defines deflation as follows: "Just as inflation is an expansion inthe supply of money and credit, deflation is a contraction in the supply ofmoney and credit.  Deflation is not falling prices.  Falling prices are aconsequence of deflation. It is dangerous to confuse the two ideas becauseprices can fall </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106201166632846136'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106201166632846136'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106201166632846136' title='Can the Fed Stop Deflation?'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106181899249102283</id><published>2003-08-25T06:43:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-25T06:49:13.313-07:00</updated><title type='text'>K-Wave V: The Rise of Machines</title><summary type='text'>Thinking about the K Wave question: will the coming always-on world being brought to us by widespread broadband and wireless connectivity be the new factor of production that takes us out of the K-Wave Winter and starts the cycle anew?  A broader new factor is digitization, of which the always-on world is a subset.  It may finally take us out of the 'paperless' office into a new paradigm where </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106181899249102283'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106181899249102283'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106181899249102283' title='K-Wave V: The Rise of Machines'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106169427655486583</id><published>2003-08-23T20:04:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-23T20:32:41.606-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Silicon Valley Tea Leaves: Signs of Hope</title><summary type='text'>Two positive reports from Intel and Motorola, as reported by the NY Times.  Intel sees increased demand for chips, and Moto sees stronger demand for cell phones.  In tech markets, increased orders for chips reflects growing optimism by systems vendors, and so chips tend to recover first, followed by, followed by PCs/systems and then software.   In the cell phone market, increased orders for </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106169427655486583'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106169427655486583'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106169427655486583' title='Silicon Valley Tea Leaves: Signs of Hope'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106161498420170941</id><published>2003-08-22T22:03:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-22T22:03:04.130-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Money Supply</title><summary type='text'>  Back in the   Kondretioff Fall period of the 1980s, when Volcker dramatically limited the   supply of money in order to break inflationary expectations, we watched   money supply indicators slavishly for insight as to where markets might be   headed.  Now as we deflate through the Kondretioff Winter, we pay little   attention to the money supply.  Greenspan is continuing his massive   </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106161498420170941'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106161498420170941'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106161498420170941' title='Money Supply'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106151576699662437</id><published>2003-08-21T18:29:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-25T06:41:06.600-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Kondretioff Rules</title><summary type='text'>Yelnick has   received some questions regarding whether the Kondretioff Wave conditions have   been satisfied, which would be another supporting condition for a new bull market, or whether a major deflationary debacle awaits.  Like all cycles,  the K Wave is more descriptive than prescriptive (Elliott Waves are more prescriptive than cycles), but provides enormous insight into our current  </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106151576699662437'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106151576699662437'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106151576699662437' title='Kondretioff Rules'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106125002518789354</id><published>2003-08-18T16:40:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-18T16:40:25.200-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Silicon Valley Tea Leaves: Mixed Signals </title><summary type='text'>  Sy Harding in   StreetSmart has an excellent analysis here of   mixed economic signals.  Summary: real estate cooling may be offset by   slight uptick in manufacturing, but jobs figure took a tumble in July after a   stabilizing June.  This on top of revisions in past growth rates   (downwards) and expectations that Q2 growth of 2.4% is largely due to one-time   Iraq war blip.  Also, increased </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106125002518789354'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106125002518789354'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106125002518789354' title='Silicon Valley Tea Leaves: Mixed Signals '/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106124759650075560</id><published>2003-08-18T15:59:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-19T00:19:26.363-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Count Clarity</title><summary type='text'>STU has  moved the count to Yelnick's: we are still in wave 2, and have a final 5th wave   up to go.  We have been in either a fourth wave triangle, which ended two   weeks ago, or in a fifth wave diagonal triangle since early July.  This   count fits the corrective behavior of the market over the last 7 weeks.    Either way the prognosis is the same:  we should see a little more upside,   then a</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106124759650075560'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106124759650075560'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106124759650075560' title='Count Clarity'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106098842006983844</id><published>2003-08-15T16:00:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-15T16:00:16.666-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Count Outage</title><summary type='text'>    I have held off announcing the count as we wend though   the summer doldrums.  Where we have been is a major wave 1 down to Oct02   and a wave 2 back up to this summer.  Question has been whether wave 2 has   ended, or has one final 5th wave thrust up.  STU initally held wave 2 as   ending on Jun17; now they see it as ending on Jul31 with a truncated   wave [v] top that barely got back to the</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106098842006983844'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106098842006983844'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106098842006983844' title='Count Outage'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106082429448969038</id><published>2003-08-13T18:24:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-13T18:29:36.123-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Tax Cut cut</title><summary type='text'>  Yelnick has   previously commented that the dividend tax 'cut' was a poor idea.  Double   taxation on dividends is less a double tax than a tax shelter - it shelters   growing companies from being asked to distribute their retained earnings in   dividends.  Without the this tax shield, they either grow slower or have to   go to the ever volatile capital markets for growth capital.     The WSJ</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106082429448969038'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106082429448969038'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106082429448969038' title='Tax Cut cut'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106066872302792943</id><published>2003-08-11T23:12:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-12T18:07:32.963-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Recalling Prop 13</title><summary type='text'>  Prop 13 in   California in 1978 presaged the tax revolt that led Reagan into office and   defined 25 years of Republican policy (marred only by Bush Sr. making a Faustian   bargain with Congress to limit spending in exchange for a new tax increase, a   reneging on his pledge of 'Read my lips, no new taxes' and a contributing factor   to his subsequent electoral defeat).       The California   </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106066872302792943'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106066872302792943'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106066872302792943' title='Recalling Prop 13'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106062631701474997</id><published>2003-08-11T11:25:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-11T11:25:16.976-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Silicon Valley Tea Leaves: IPO Market Cools</title><summary type='text'>  The Merky News   reported today that: "Silicon Valley's summer fling   with initial public offerings is over, making it clear an important part of the   technology industry's long-awaited recovery won't unfold quickly.         "Four local companies launched IPOs in just six weeks:   FormFactor of Livermore on June 12, InterVideo of Fremont on July 17, iPass of   Redwood Shores on July 24 and </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106062631701474997'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106062631701474997'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106062631701474997' title='Silicon Valley Tea Leaves: IPO Market Cools'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106056760653651646</id><published>2003-08-10T19:06:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-10T19:06:46.553-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Silicon Valley Tea Leaves: The End of the VC Game?</title><summary type='text'>  Friday's WSJ ran a   front-page story on how difficult it may turn for new companies to make money in   WiFi.  Why?  The quickness of the market dominant tech companies to   respond.  In the prior high-tech cycles, the entrenched tech leaders were   often overtaken by the little furry mammal companies.  This time the   entrenched leaders have stolen from the VC playbook and quickly jumped into </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106056760653651646'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106056760653651646'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106056760653651646' title='Silicon Valley Tea Leaves: The End of the VC Game?'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106056686812057045</id><published>2003-08-10T18:54:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-10T19:06:40.676-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Credibility Gap</title><summary type='text'>    LBJ   escalated US forces in Vietnam based on the Gulf of Tonkin incident, where he  claimed North Vietnamese gunboats had attacked US ships.  There was almost   immediate dispute over the President's version of the incident, and it led to   the phrase 'Credibility Gap.'  LBJ talked of victory, TV showed a   quagmire.  LBJ's Credibility Gap grew to Grand Canyonesque proportions   after the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106056686812057045'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106056686812057045'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106056686812057045' title='Credibility Gap'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106022414269240189</id><published>2003-08-06T19:42:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-06T19:42:22.596-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Bubbles' Baubles Babble </title><summary type='text'>Good post, Ethan.  Yes, some speculation is occurring, but this does not have the characteristic of a speculative blowoff.   Bubbles burst after a speculative frenzy caused by easy credit.  Credit fuels the frenzy, money is misspent on baubles, and when the bubble bursts, the money created by debt evaporates.   Left behind is overcapacity, bankruptcy, fierce price competiton, deflation.  Think </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106022414269240189'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106022414269240189'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106022414269240189' title='Bubbles&apos; Baubles Babble '/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106020866781825612</id><published>2003-08-06T15:24:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-06T15:31:42.430-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Bubbles, speculation, and the wealth effect</title><summary type='text'>In his previous post, Duncan said, "The housing increase is not really a bubble, since a bubble would reflect speculative excess, whereas we have so far seen refinancings with some $ taken off the table as opposed to borrowing to speculate (e.g., 'no down payment' types of purchases).  Bubble or not, history says it will correct &amp; this will sap what little staying power still exists in the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106020866781825612'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106020866781825612'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106020866781825612' title='&lt;strong&gt;Bubbles, speculation, and the wealth effect&lt;/strong&gt;'/><author><name>Ethan</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='22' height='32' src='http://farm1.static.flickr.com/29/61105188_5f14ee855a_o.jpg'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106020766572940163</id><published>2003-08-06T15:07:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-06T15:07:45.750-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Where We Are: Dog Days of August</title><summary type='text'>    When Sirius,   the Dog Star, rose in the evening sky, the Romans called the time the Dog Days   of August.  As we entered August, the market, which had doggedly kept   afloat all summer, has begun to roll over, and now may be turning into   a serious dog. The key level of SP962 was breached today, and although the   market rebounded, it presages a further drop into next   week.     We have </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106020766572940163'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106020766572940163'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106020766572940163' title='Where We Are: Dog Days of August'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106020548597694174</id><published>2003-08-06T14:31:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-06T14:31:25.960-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Deficit Away!</title><summary type='text'>    The Federal budget deficit will be $455 billion,   roughly 50 percent larger than the White House estimated in February, the   President's Office of Management and Budget said this afternoon. The   projected deficit announced today, for the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, is up   sharply from the $304 billion deficit the budget office foresaw six months ago.   Unless conditions change </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106020548597694174'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106020548597694174'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106020548597694174' title='Deficit Away!'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106020542332924971</id><published>2003-08-06T14:30:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-06T14:30:23.310-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Silicon Valley Tea Leaves: Iced Tea </title><summary type='text'>  &gt; Tech   results don't augur well for spending recovery - ReutersResults from   several major tech companies suggest the long-awaited techrecovery hasn't   arrived yet. Motorola posted weaker-than-expectedquarterly revenue and   reduced its forecasts. Lucent said it would miss itsprofit targets. Intel's   results beat expectations, but CFO Andy Bryantsaid he saw no signs of   companies </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106020542332924971'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106020542332924971'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106020542332924971' title='Silicon Valley Tea Leaves: Iced Tea '/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106020806241189923</id><published>2003-08-06T12:14:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-06T15:14:43.046-07:00</updated><title type='text'> Silicon Valley Tea Leaves: Green Tea?</title><summary type='text'>More indications of a turn in eCommerce Times.   "This Valley seems to function in 15-year waves -- and we're at the beginning of the next cycle," says Bill Tai, general manager at Charles River Ventures.   Mood lifters include: * Better business conditions. * Surging tech stocks. * A "back-to-the-lab" movement.  The glimmers of hope have lured back entrepreneurs like Joe Kraus, who </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106020806241189923'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106020806241189923'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106020806241189923' title=' Silicon Valley Tea Leaves: Green Tea?'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106013748037211189</id><published>2003-08-05T19:38:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-05T19:38:00.390-07:00</updated><title type='text'>More Stocks Away!</title><summary type='text'>  The wave action   since July 31 is fairly clear: we have done a little wave 1 down, a wave 2   back, and are now part of the way through a sharp wave 3 down.    Tomorrow should continue down to finish this wave 3, then reverse.  The   reversal will tell a lot to resolve whether we are still have further upside   this summer, or whether Jun17 is truly the end of wave 2 since October.  We   still</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106013748037211189'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106013748037211189'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106013748037211189' title='More Stocks Away!'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-106009498210533021</id><published>2003-08-05T07:49:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-05T07:49:42.086-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Silicon Valley Tea Leaves: VC hit rock bottom?</title><summary type='text'>  AlwaysOn   reports that Jim Breyer of Accel thinks "that we’re near the bottom of the   venture capital cycle. We’re not quite there yet, but we’re getting   close."  He adds:      "Our best   experiences have been with startups that deliver their first product to market   within 12 to 18 months ... If the product development cycle is longer than 18 months,   then the chances of matching the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106009498210533021'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/106009498210533021'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106009498210533021' title='Silicon Valley Tea Leaves: VC hit rock bottom?'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-105996313052345394</id><published>2003-08-03T19:12:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-03T19:12:10.523-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Stocks Away!</title><summary type='text'>  The developing   triangle appears to have ended, impulsively down, on Thurs/Fri.  This   triangle could be a wave 4 with a 5 to follow, but the consensus of ewavers is   that it was a wave B trianngle within a subwave 2 reversal of the peak on Jun17,   and the uptrend since last March, and indeed last October has ended.  Next   week should tell.        The Bonds Away!   reversal (rates spiking </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105996313052345394'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105996313052345394'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#105996313052345394' title='Stocks Away!'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-105996312958565091</id><published>2003-08-03T19:12:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-03T19:12:09.586-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Stocks Away!</title><summary type='text'>The developing triangle appears to have ended, impulsively down, on Thurs/Fri.  This triangle could be a wave 4 with a 5 to follow, but the consensus of ewavers is that it was a wave B trianngle within a subwave 2 reversal of the peak on Jun17, and the uptrend since last March, and indeed last October has ended.  Next week should tell.    The Bonds Away! reversal (rates spiking up) means herd </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105996312958565091'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105996312958565091'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#105996312958565091' title='Stocks Away!'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-105996228910722592</id><published>2003-08-01T18:56:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-08-03T19:10:58.763-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Bonds Away!</title><summary type='text'>CBS Marketwatch reported that they don't know when previously the T bond gained 150 bp in 6 weeks.  The 10-year Treasury bond hit 4.6% Friday from 3.076% on June 16.  Of course, six weeks ago the US deficit wasn't headed towards $450B or higher per year for the foreseeable future.  The PIMCO bond fund has been returning 9% for the past two years, but the party appears to be over.  the Elliott </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105996228910722592'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105996228910722592'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#105996228910722592' title='Bonds Away!'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-105961492131333169</id><published>2003-07-30T18:28:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-07-30T18:28:41.256-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Tip of the triangle</title><summary type='text'>  Wave count is at a   tipping point. Some form of top occurred on Jun17 in the major indicies, Jun6 on   the small stock indicies.  We have been in wave 2 up from Oct02.  It   has retraced 61.8% of the drop into Oct02, so the normal Elliott pattern is   satisfied.  But - there is always a but - Yelnick has noted that the two prior wave   2 reversals in the Dow (sep00-mar01, and sep01-mar02) went</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105961492131333169'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105961492131333169'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html#105961492131333169' title='Tip of the triangle'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-105886013726124593</id><published>2003-07-22T00:48:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-07-22T00:48:57.130-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Stacked onsie-twosies</title><summary type='text'>  Been off the air a   bit due to a broken Blogspot, but they *finally* fixed it.  I tried to   light a fire under Pyra, the company behind Blogger and Blogspot, but now that   they have been bought by Google, they took their time about it.  And good   time they did!   Looks like we may be about to see some action in this   market.  After going essentially nowhere for the past month, we appear to</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105886013726124593'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105886013726124593'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html#105886013726124593' title='Stacked onsie-twosies'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-105798623009054029</id><published>2003-07-10T21:56:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-07-15T16:56:22.720-07:00</updated><title type='text'>78.6% Holding</title><summary type='text'>The 78.6% retracement level (which is a fibonacci number, the square root of phi, 61.8%) has held so far. This number is peculiarly interesting in this bear market. Normally wave 2's retrace 61.8%, but in this post-mania market, most wave 2's have gone 78.6%: &gt; the first wave [1] to Sep00 after the peak was reversed 78.6% by wave [2] to Mar01 &gt; the next wave (1) of [3] to Sep01 (post 9/11) was </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105798623009054029'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105798623009054029'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html#105798623009054029' title='78.6% Holding'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-105788905667190645</id><published>2003-07-10T19:04:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-07-15T16:56:54.630-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Silicon Valley Tea Leaves</title><summary type='text'>Yelnick has been watching the indicators of a bottom in the real economy in Silicon Valley, Ground Zero for the bear market.  It appears that an interim bottom in VC investing occurred last Dec02 (some pundits say Feb03), as VC activity has picked up, although valuations haven't budged much.  Yelnick noticed a change in attitude of the recently disemployed from seaking jobs to working on business</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105788905667190645'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105788905667190645'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html#105788905667190645' title='Silicon Valley Tea Leaves'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-105762893487294076</id><published>2003-07-07T18:48:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-07-07T18:48:54.740-07:00</updated><title type='text'>78.6% or Bust!</title><summary type='text'>A famous 'line in the sand' was the Oregon Territory's Fifty-Four Forty or Fight!  Today we have a little wave 2 reversing up to 78.6% of the little wave 1 down from Jun17.  Usually 78.6% is the Elliott Territory line in the sand.  Although Elliott rules allow a wave 2 to go all the way back to the start of wave 1, typically when it reverses past 78.6% it means it wasn't a wave 2 at all but the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105762893487294076'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105762893487294076'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html#105762893487294076' title='78.6% or Bust!'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-105677207412464227</id><published>2003-06-27T20:47:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-06-27T20:47:53.960-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Stacked Against US!</title><summary type='text'>Wave pattern looks like a stacking of 1 down - 2 up at smaller and smaller degrees.  This usually sets up a serious decline, as happened last Sept after a series of 1s and 2s.  The big 1 - 2 is the first drop off the 2000 highs to Sep00, followed by a reversal most of the way back to Mar01; the second is the drop after 9/11, followed by a reversal to Mar02, where the Dow got to over 10600, just </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105677207412464227'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105677207412464227'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_06_01_archive.html#105677207412464227' title='Stacked Against US!'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-105643817956831301</id><published>2003-06-24T00:02:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-07-04T00:38:54.093-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Plunge Protection Team &amp; Moral Risk</title><summary type='text'>Continuing from the commentary yesterday, what is the implication of the Fed pumping the market?  There was much discussion in the '80s during the bailout of the S&amp;L crisis of moral risk for debt, the risk that if the cavalry comes in at the last minute to bail out poor banking practices, the bankers will learn to lend in an even more risky fashion.  Similarly, when the Plunge Protection Team was</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105643817956831301'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105643817956831301'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_06_01_archive.html#105643817956831301' title='Plunge Protection Team &amp; Moral Risk'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-105634511318272279</id><published>2003-06-22T22:11:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-07-04T00:38:04.070-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Plunge Protection Team &amp; Wave Count</title><summary type='text'>One can explain the current market market situation through Fed actions, as follows.In 1998 after the Asian Flu and the LTCM debacle, the Fed pumped liquidity into major US banks.  Whether this was through the rumored Plunge Protection Team to intervene in equity markets is still unknown.  Normally the lag from the Fed pumping liquidity to economic impact on Main Street is 18 months +/- 6 </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105634511318272279'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/105634511318272279'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_06_01_archive.html#105634511318272279' title='Plunge Protection Team &amp; Wave Count'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200437667</id><published>2003-06-18T21:19:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-06-18T21:19:40.486-07:00</updated><title type='text'> Brain experts now follow the money</title><summary type='text'>From JP Morgan's daily newsletter, investigations which could substantiate the tie between emotional-driven financial decisions and stock movements, the foundation for Elliott Wave theory:Neuroscience may soon shed light on all sorts of economic behavior,The New York Times reported yesterday. Researchers are busy scanningthe brains of people as they make economic decisions, barter,compete, </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200437667'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200437667'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_06_01_archive.html#200437667' title=' Brain experts now follow the money'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200427919</id><published>2003-06-15T23:02:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-06-15T23:02:13.226-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Elliott Waverers</title><summary type='text'>Even the toughest ewavers are beginning to look for a bull count.  But not Prechter!  He sent out a report to put it all in perspective.  Of course, he also missed the bull run from 1994 - 2000, so convinced he was the top was in.  But his current view is worth contemplating.  In effect, he pleads guilty of crying Bear! too often.  By being so ready to call the end of wave 2 and missing it so </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200427919'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200427919'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_06_01_archive.html#200427919' title='Elliott Waverers'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200396673</id><published>2003-06-06T21:18:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-06-06T21:18:41.430-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Prodding the Bears</title><summary type='text'>You gotta love this rally.  Step by step it turns bears into bulls, or sheep.  Yet a pullback is due.This last few weeks is a classic wave extension, which tend to go 1.618 the first leg.  Usually this happens in a wave 3 or 5 of an impulse, or in a wave C of an ABC correction.  Extensions reflect the momentum players jumping on the trend; in this cases, bulls frothing at the mouth.  Today in </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200396673'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200396673'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_06_01_archive.html#200396673' title='Prodding the Bears'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200387395</id><published>2003-06-04T22:10:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-06-04T22:10:44.793-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Dow Joins the Party</title><summary type='text'>By cresting Dow9043 intraday, the Dow joins the S&amp;P and Nasdaq, which both exceeded their Dec highs a few days ago.  The last ewave holdout, Prechter's STU, has now moved to the Yelnick count.  The count in all market indexes is now wave 2 from the Oct lows.  And this is behaving exactly like a wave 2 should - drawing everyone including the uber bears into the view that the bull is back.  When </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200387395'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200387395'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_06_01_archive.html#200387395' title='Dow Joins the Party'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200382371</id><published>2003-06-03T21:08:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-06-03T21:48:30.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Elliott Wave Basics</title><summary type='text'>The Yelnick thread has new members, so I thought it worthwhile to give a brief intro to ewaves.  A better tutorial is available for free at Club EWI.  Ellliott developed his theory in the 30s. Prechter picked it up in the 70s and made a killing calling the 1982-87 period correctly.  (Typical wave 1, many people were skeptical of the bull.)  Then, Prechter called the top multiple times in the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200382371'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200382371'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_06_01_archive.html#200382371' title='Elliott Wave Basics'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200377176</id><published>2003-06-02T20:08:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-06-02T20:08:31.460-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Key Reversal Day</title><summary type='text'>Today is a classic reversal day - break of trendlines followed by an impulsive 5-wave drop below the trendline, particularly on the Naz.  Dow is hovering right above its upper trendline.  Dow still might make a second run at 9043, its Dec high, but watch closely to see if S&amp;P breaks SP980.  If the reversal has happened, it shouldn't. Some of the Elliott Wave pundits with sites went short today.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200377176'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200377176'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_06_01_archive.html#200377176' title='Key Reversal Day'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200371756</id><published>2003-06-01T20:31:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-06-01T20:31:23.603-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Contrarian Crash Course</title><summary type='text'>According to Ned Davis, as reported in the EWI monthly report Friday, bullish sentiment has not been this high since 1987, just before the crash!  The STU goes even further, and compares this to the bullishness at the end of great wave 2 in 1930 after the Crash of 1929.  The true market debacle followed.  Is the market about to get a crash course in contrarian thinking?  The bullishness has so </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200371756'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200371756'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_06_01_archive.html#200371756' title='Contrarian Crash Course'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200358773</id><published>2003-05-29T12:34:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-29T12:34:21.136-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Short the squeezers, or, entering the Amazone!</title><summary type='text'>These fast pops off interim bottoms happen due to short squeezes.  Looking back, you can see these sharp rallies on Oct11, Feb13, Mar12, and now May27.  Interesting question is why are the shorts being so victimized so frequently?   One view, which is circulating with some seriousness, is market manipulation by the Fed.  This view goes back to 1997-8, when rumors flew that the Fed had </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200358773'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200358773'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200358773' title='Short the squeezers, or, entering the Amazone!'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200355637</id><published>2003-05-28T20:51:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-28T20:51:38.043-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Kissing the Neckline - Goodbye or Good Buy?</title><summary type='text'>The S&amp;P hit the neckline of the massive H&amp;S pattern today, then backed off.   Looks like tomorrow will be a down day.  We may have topped.  If so, we will have kissed the neckline goodbye and *finally* begin the 3 of 3.  If not, watch closely the SP955-975 range - if we break through, this rally has a ways to go.  If we stay in that range, then this is one more annoying hickey and we should all </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200355637'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200355637'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200355637' title='Kissing the Neckline - Goodbye or Good Buy?'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200348697</id><published>2003-05-27T14:55:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-27T14:55:56.483-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Wave Too Much</title><summary type='text'>The Yelnick preferred scenario is that we are still in a wave 2 since October, and wave 3 has not yet started.  Most of the Elliott Wave community counts wave 2 as having come back in December, and us as being in the waves [i] and [ii] down of wave 3.  The continued corrective activity makes this count more and more difficult to sustain.  As reported recently, the Nasdaq count has switched to the</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200348697'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200348697'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200348697' title='Wave Too Much'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200343273</id><published>2003-05-26T22:10:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-27T08:48:00.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Tech Bottom or More Transitory Wave 2 Optimism?</title><summary type='text'>I mentioned recently (May 7 post) that we may have seen a bottom in tech in December.  VC activity has picked up, noticably.  MSNBC ran a good analysis of this change.  Recent information, however, suggests that this pick up may not yet signal a change in trend.  The pick up in Q1 seems to be tapering off. Worse, Fenwick &amp; West report that this optimism is not being reflected in valuations and </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200343273'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200343273'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200343273' title='Tech Bottom or More Transitory Wave 2 Optimism?'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200340020</id><published>2003-05-25T18:57:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-25T19:19:13.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Duck Soup</title><summary type='text'>When Reagan was shot, he had enough sense left to drop a line from a movie - Honey, I forgot to duck!  The Bulls may soon feel the same way.  There is a cauldron of trouble brewing.  Another weak Secy of the Treasury is letting the Dollar free-fall.  Deflation.  Slow economy through 2003.  The Fog of Peace in Iraq.  Increased terrorist activity.  North Korean Nukes R Us.  Will this soup be enough</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200340020'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200340020'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200340020' title='Duck Soup'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200330810</id><published>2003-05-22T22:07:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-22T22:07:55.490-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Topping Action</title><summary type='text'>Magic number today was Dow8618, the 61.8% retracement of wave ii.  Market hit near it and reversed a couple of times, then popped through to 8628 and faded at the close.  Wave ii could have ended today, but more likely has one more pop up to go.  Futures are up at the moment.  </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200330810'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200330810'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200330810' title='Topping Action'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200320166</id><published>2003-05-20T20:33:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-20T20:33:51.180-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Mad Cow Gores Bulls!</title><summary type='text'>Mad Cow disease was spotted in Canada, and blamed for the market drop.  Elliott knows better.  Now that the Bear has left the barn, we have left the corrective manure behind.  The wave pattern is a clear 5 wave impulse down from the morning high on Friday.  If we stay with the orthodox Elliott count, we ended wave [ii] of 3 down and have entered wave [iii] of 3.  The last three days was a little </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200320166'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200320166'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200320166' title='Mad Cow Gores Bulls!'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200314203</id><published>2003-05-19T17:24:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-19T17:24:48.943-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Greatest Shorting Opportunity fo All Time??</title><summary type='text'>The decisive break today down makes it quite possible that the 3 of 3 has started.  We had been in an ending diagonal triangle and had the possibility that the down move was wave 4 with wave 5 to go.  The impulse down today broke through the levels that would support that count, and hence increased the likelihood that this wave [ii] from Mar12 is done, and wave [iii] of 3 of (3) has begun.  The </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200314203'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200314203'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200314203' title='Greatest Shorting Opportunity fo All Time??'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200309621</id><published>2003-05-18T22:19:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-18T22:19:15.403-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Still Bullish After All These Tears</title><summary type='text'>The ewavers are beginning to falter in light of the rampant bullishness, yet nothing suggests anything other than a typical wave 2 bear market rally with attendent extreme complacency.   It could have ended last week, but most likely a pullback followed by a final little pop higher is in order.  If S&amp;P breaks its Dec high of 954, the S&amp;P count will shift to match the Nasdaq - we would be in a </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200309621'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200309621'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200309621' title='Still Bullish After All These Tears'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200293724</id><published>2003-05-14T22:50:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-14T23:02:57.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Lunacy Eclipses Technicals</title><summary type='text'>Tomorrow is a lunar eclipse.  This sometimes brings out the worst in the ewave community.  Even the Great One himself, Prechter, launched yet another interim bulletin this morning to encourage his faithful to stay the course.  His charting was clear and concise - more on that below - but his long preamble was intended to show how the Carolan Spiral Calendar could be made to substantiate the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200293724'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200293724'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200293724' title='Lunacy Eclipses Technicals'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200282168</id><published>2003-05-12T21:45:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-12T21:55:34.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Cycles Trumping Waves</title><summary type='text'>The ewavers are still scratching their collective heads (and running their fingernails down their whiteboards) about this persistent wave 2.   Time for a broader perspective.  I have mentioned a UCLA physics prof who has tried to curve fit bear markets following manic peaks.  His analysis is - as the bear lengthens, so do the length of the waves.  Hence he predicts we will not see the 3 of the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200282168'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200282168'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200282168' title='Cycles Trumping Waves'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200281254</id><published>2003-05-12T16:45:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-12T16:45:37.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Blog Use Growing Like the Web Used To</title><summary type='text'>Kevin Werbach's Werblog reported today that an analysis of weblog.com statistics here shows that the number of weblog updates is not just growing but in last few months has grown much faster.  Thus the outing of blogging which happened around the start of the war is now being reflected in the statistics of blog usage.  </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200281254'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200281254'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200281254' title='Blog Use Growing Like the Web Used To'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200275990</id><published>2003-05-11T18:51:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-11T19:02:28.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Extreme Bullishness -&gt; The Top is Nigh</title><summary type='text'>The current count looks like we are ending a little wave 4 to be followed by a 5 to complete wave C of 2.  The ewavers have all backed off trying to pick the top.  If Monday opens weak, little wave 4 may have a few more days to go. If Monday opens strong, we should zip up in the final 5 wave.   Look for possible top during the next fib turn period of May 20 - 31.  How high might it go?  We have</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200275990'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200275990'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200275990' title='Extreme Bullishness -&gt; The Top is Nigh'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200259723</id><published>2003-05-07T23:27:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-08T19:23:35.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Has the Nasdaq Bottomed?</title><summary type='text'>As we near the end of a wave 2, the extreme bullishness reflects a higher level of the same bullishness that got us into the mania in the first place.  Mutual funds and day traders are buying because everyone else is &amp; they don't want to be left behind - significantly, not because their analysis of individual stocks or of the market says to do so.  It is goin' up 'cuz it's goin' up.  The </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200259723'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200259723'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200259723' title='Has the Nasdaq Bottomed?'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200253827</id><published>2003-05-06T22:52:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-08T19:24:26.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Battle of the Bulletins</title><summary type='text'>Prechter, Wavespeak &amp; Zoran all launched mid-day bulletins today.  You gotta love Prechter.  On Friday he says no way will it poke above Dow8612.  Today it did, and Prechter stuck to his guns.  Ok, so what he read as a wave 5 on Friday was only a 3, and needed a final wave 5, so that is what happened.  But this is it.  He compares this to his most epic call, a call for the ages: in Sep 1985, in</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200253827'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200253827'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200253827' title='Battle of the Bulletins'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5165875.post-200242695</id><published>2003-05-05T00:06:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2003-05-05T00:06:56.130-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Short the Shorts!</title><summary type='text'>Wonderful moment in the market - the moment of truth for the Elliott world.  The core ewave pundits (Prechter, Neely, etc.) have said over the past week that it is a good time to short the market (although Neely may have flipped back to bullishness Friday according to Zoran).  This at a time when bullishness is growing and short positions diminishing.  The ewave true believers may be a </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200242695'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5165875/posts/default/200242695'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://yelnick.blogspot.com/2003_05_01_archive.html#200242695' title='Short the Shorts!'/><author><name>dd</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15652192144905028920</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry></feed>
